Another type of restraint could have been imposed by allowing marriage only after the person had begun to earn a living. This would ensure that the person is able to assume responsibility for a family when marriage is contracted, therefore reducing the burden on the parents of the parties and on society as a whole. Conjugal intermediation contracts, distinct from agreements limiting marriage, are defined as contracts by which a third person is paid to negotiate, obtain or obtain a marriage. It can be noted here that the intercessation of marriage was widespread, at least among Hindus, in pre-independent India, as indicated by the Hindu Law of The Contract Act, the first law passed in India, which explicitly concluded such an agreement which, by its effects, would lead to the freedom of one of the parties, according to their desire to marry would be limited. Empty. The basic idea of this provision was to ensure that citizens did not lose their right to marriage after their election, which is an essential element of a civil society of personal and social importance, due to a contractual obligation contracted at any time. One of the essential conditions for the conclusion of the contract is that it must not be void. Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act states that “all agreements are contracts. which are not expressly cancelled”.
A contract can be cancelled for several reasons, for example: in addition, according to English law, brokerage contracts or commitments made on the consideration of obtaining or establishing a marriage are considered illegal for several social reasons. Section 27 of the Act refers only to one exception that favours the restriction of trade, that is, the sale of business property or corporations. Another exception is the Partnership Act. Some agreements are simply detrimental to society. They are against public order. Some of these agreements are agreements aimed at limiting material, commercial or judicial proceedings. These agreements are expressly set aside in the Indian Contracts Act, in sections 26, 27 and 28 respectively. Scott-Smith, J. “To impose such a custom would be to say that an adult woman cannot marry a man unless the man pays a large sum, which might be impossible for him, to his closest male relative. It would be customary to restrict marriage and go against the principle of section 26 of the Contracts Act. For example, in today`s world, higher education often extends well beyond the age of majority. . .